How do FLJ T113 vs. eWheels TurboWheel Lighting stack up?
The electric scooters we have head to head here are the T113, manufactured by FLJ, versus the TurboWheel Lighting, manufactured by eWheels. We’ll take a deep dive into the specs of both brands, to help you decide which is better depending on your needs, and what you will mostly be using your electric scooter for.
Electric scooters are all about ease of use, versatility and convenience. They are designed to make urban commuting easy, which makes their weight one of the key characteristics to take into account.
The FLJ T113 has a total weight of 75 lbs (34 kg), whereas the eWheels TurboWheel Lighting has a total weight of 77 lbs (35 kg). Both models are quite heavy, neither is a good option for a commute where you’ll need to carry your scooter.
Equally important when considering the ease of your commute is the folded dimensions of the electric scooter, as these make a huge difference when transporting or storing the scooter. FLJ T113 folds down to 17.72" x 20.47" x 46.46", and eWheels TurboWheel Lighting folds down to 19.8" x 26.7" x 50.4".
Of course, convenience and portability is only one part of the puzzle. It is important to know how an electric scooter actually rides, and whether it will be able to handle your specific commute.
If your commute is a hilly one, then you’ll want to pay careful attention to the motor power, as this is key in getting you and your scooter up hills.
FLJ T113 has a motor power of 3200W, versus eWheels TurboWheel Lighting’s motor power of 2000W. Both models are good for hills, as both have enough power to take on any inclines you are likely to encounter.
FLJ T113 has a top speed of 53 mi/hr (85 km/hr) versus a top speed of 40 mi/hr (64 km/hr) for eWheels TurboWheel Lighting. So if you are looking at long, flat stretches on your commute, and if speed is your thing, then FLJ T113 is the best choice.
When it comes to distance travelling, however, then the range of the electric scooter is going to be a key factor. FLJ T113 has a range of 74 miles (119 km), while eWheels TurboWheel Lighting has a range of 46 miles (74 km). If your commute is more than 20 miles (32 km), then both models would be a good choice.
Battery life and recharge time are also important factors to take into account. FLJ T113 has a battery capacity of 3200W, and eWheels TurboWheel Lighting has a capacity of 1165 Wh. FLJ T113 will recharge fully from empty in 5-12 hours, and eWheels TurboWheel Lighting will take 3 hours to fully recharge.
An electric scooter also needs to be able to support the weight of the rider. FLJ T113 has a maximum rider weight of 330 lbs (150 kg), while eWheels TurboWheel Lighting can support a maximum weight of 330 lbs (150 kg).
Now onto safety. Brakes are one of the most important safety features of an electric scooter, and may be the only difference between a safely completed journey and a trip to the emergency room. There are a number of different brake options available for electric scooters, all of which have their respective pros and cons.
Disc brakes have the best braking power, give excellent control and perform well in all conditions, although they do require maintenance, and are usually the most expensive. Foot brakes are lightweight, simple, and require no maintenance, but tend to perform poorly when compared to other types, are slower to activate and need a specific riding position. Drum brakes are also low maintenance, and better performing, particularly in wet conditions, but are heavier and complicated to disassemble.
Both electronic brakes and regenerative brakes add no extra weight at all, and require no maintenance, but again both types produce less effective braking performance, and can be prone to failure. Regenerative brakes can also fail to work when the battery is fully charged.
FLJ T113 has Disc brakes, and eWheels TurboWheel Lighting has Disc brakes.
When it comes to tires, there are two options, pneumatic or solid. Pneumatic tires are more comfortable, but can burst if punctured by glass, thorns or nails. Solid rubber tires however are far more durable (and puncture-proof) but will give a more bumpy ride.
FLJ T113 has Pneumatic and eWheels TurboWheel Lighting has Pneumatic.
Suspension can also help achieve a smoother ride, and although not all electric scooters come with suspension, many models come with front or rear suspension, or both. FLJ T113 has Both, and eWheels TurboWheel Lighting has Both, making both fairly comfy rides.
These days, plenty of electric scooters come with built-in lights. Options vary with lights available at both front and back, just front lights, or just rear lights. FLJ T113 comes with both lights, and eWheels TurboWheel Lighting comes with both lights, so both are suitable if driving after dark and safety are high priorities.
The final thing to keep in mind is the warranty. This protects you in the unlikely event of a fault with the electric scooter. FLJ T113 comes with a 1 year warranty, and eWheels TurboWheel Lighting comes with a 1 Year warranty.
And there you have it, a full round up of FLJ T113 Vs. eWheels TurboWheel Lighting. Hopefully this comparison gives you an idea of the relative strengths and weaknesses of FLJ T113 and eWheels TurboWheel Lighting, and helps demonstrate which electric scooter will best suit your needs. Whichever scooter you pick, remember to always be safe, and have fun!
Side By Side Comparison Chart:
|FLJ T113||eWheels TurboWheel Lighting|
|Top Speed||53 mi/hr (85 km/hr)||40 mi/hr (64 km/hr)|
|Range||74 miles (119 km)||46 miles (74 km)|
|Weight||75 lbs (34 kg)||77 lbs (35 kg)|
|Rider Weight||330 lbs (150 kg)||330 lbs (150 kg)|
|Tire Size||11.0 inches||10.0 inches|
|Battery (WH)||3200W||1165 Wh|
|Recharge Time||5-12 hours||3 hours|
|Lights||Both Front & Rear||Both Front & Rear|
|Frame Material||Aluminum alloy|
|Standing Dimensions||50.39" x 20.47" x 46.46"||48.0" x 26.7" x 50.4"|
|Folded Dimensions||17.72" x 20.47" x 46.46"||19.8" x 26.7" x 50.4"|